Our Fight Against The Climate Killer

In order to save CO2, the raw mate­ri­als indus­try must reor­ga­nize its pro­duc­tion process­es and sat­is­fy its fierce appetite for ener­gy from pow­er grids. But it is only by work­ing togeth­er that grid oper­a­tors and indus­try spe­cial­ists will ensure pow­er qual­i­ty in the future.


To slow the rate of cli­mate change, sup­pli­ers, grid oper­a­tors, and grid plan­ners world­wide must make mas­sive efforts to sub­sti­tute fos­sil fuels with renew­ables. Depend­ing on the cir­cum­stances, grids will need to trans­port about 50% more elec­tric­i­ty by 2040, amount­ing to a range between 38,000 and 41,000 TWh (see ONLOAD 07). How­ev­er, the ener­gy tran­si­tion chal­lenge can only be met if all major con­sumers work toward the same goal.

22 %

of global CO 2 emissions are caused by the production of steel (10%), aluminum (4%), and cement (8%) alone. If climate change is to be stopped, we urgently need to change how we produce raw materials.


Accord­ing to grid spe­cial­ist Dr Stephan Rupp, Busi­ness Devel­op­ment Man­ag­er for Pow­er Elec­tron­ics at Rein­hausen and pro­fes­sor at the Cen­ter for Advanced Stud­ies at the Baden-Würt­tem­berg Coop­er­a­tive State Uni­ver­si­ty, three indus­tries are par­tic­u­lar­ly affect­ed by this change: “The ener­gy-inten­sive pro­duc­tion of steel, alu­minum, and cement releas­es more than eight bil­lion met­ric tons of CO2every year. This accounts for a total of more than 22 per­cent of glob­al emis­sions of what is effec­tive­ly a cli­mate killer. The next few years will see a sweep­ing rev­o­lu­tion in this field which will have dras­tic effects on pow­er grids.”

UP TO 95 PERCENT LESS CO2

At 3.5 bil­lion met­ric tons of CO2, steel pro­duc­tion alone is respon­si­ble for around ten per­cent of total annu­al emis­sions. “In addi­tion to the pres­sure to dras­ti­cal­ly reduce car­bon diox­ide emis­sions, pos­si­ble raw mate­r­i­al short­ages are also forc­ing the indus­try to rethink its strate­gies,” Stephan Rupp reports. “If pro­duc­tion lev­els were to remain at the cur­rent figures, glob­al sup­plies of iron ore could be exhaust­ed in around 70 years,” he adds. At present, 70 per­cent of the steel pro­duced each year comes from pri­ma­ry reserves—in oth­er words ore. How­ev­er, pro­jec­tions show that the world’s appetite for steel is grow­ing steadi­ly, which is rapid­ly exac­er­bat­ing the sit­u­a­tion.

LET’S TAKE STEEL AS AN EXAMPLE


CO2 emis­sions per met­ric ton of steel by process step:

  • Pre-pro­cess­ing of ore (sin­ter mate­r­i­al, pel­lets) and coke pro­duc­tion: approx. 1.2 met­ric tons
  • Iron pro­duc­tion: Reduc­tion of ore (iron oxide) to pig iron using car­bon: approx. 1 met­ric ton
  • Steel pro­duc­tion from melt­ing fur­naces with oxy­gen injec­tion (main­ly from pig iron): approx. 0.8 met­ric tons
  • Steel pro­duc­tion from elec­tric arc fur­naces (main­ly from scrap met­al): approx. 0.3 met­ric tons

With regard to the conflict caused by the scarci­ty of raw mate­ri­als and the need for a cli­mate-friend­ly restruc­tur­ing of pro­duc­tion meth­ods, Stephan Rupp sug­gests a solu­tion involv­ing estab­lish­ing mate­r­i­al cycles and simul­ta­ne­ous­ly con­vert­ing pro­duc­tion plants to use larg­er pro­por­tions of scrap met­al. And all of this must nat­u­ral­ly include the use of renew­able ener­gies. “To achieve this goal, more and more con­ven­tion­al melt­ing fur­naces will have to be replaced in the future by elec­tric arc fur­naces that draw elec­tric­i­ty from renew­able ener­gy sources,” he explains.

“Depend­ing on the process used, the indus­try could poten­tial­ly save between 40% and 95% of CO2 emis­sions.”Dr. Stephan Rupp

“The increas­ing use of scrap met­al also elim­i­nates a pro­por­tion of the emis­sions caused by the ener­gy-inten­sive extrac­tion of pig iron from ore. This would mean that this part of the pro­duc­tion chain would already be vir­tu­al­ly free of emis­sions. Depend­ing on the process used, the indus­try could poten­tial­ly save between 40% and 95% of CO2 emis­sions.”

CEMENT PRODUCTION

Hot on the heels of the steel indus­try, the con­struc­tion sec­tor is anoth­er big indus­tri­al con­trib­u­tor to cli­mate change. Glob­al cement pro­duc­tion cur­rent­ly amounts to more than 4.6 bil­lion met­ric tons per year which releas­es approx­i­mate­ly three bil­lion met­ric tons of CO2. This is equiv­a­lent to around eight per­cent of glob­al emis­sions— more than the com­bined share caused by air traf- more than the com­bined share caused by air traf more than the com­bined share caused by air traffic and data cen­ters. To pro­duce cement, lime­stone, sand, and clay are crushed and ground in gigan­tic plants and burned at more than 1,400 degrees.

8 bil­lion met­ric tons of CO 2 are emit­ted by the three ener­gy-inten­sive process­es of steel, cement, and alu­minum pro­duc­tion.

This process pro­duces a lot of CO2, which has a major impact on cli­mate change and which could eas­i­ly be sig­nifi­cant­ly reduced by using renew­able sources of ener­gy. “Admit­ted­ly, the major­i­ty of the total emis­sions are linked to the cement pro­duc­tion itself: As a raw mate­r­i­al, lime­stone con­tains vast amounts of CO 2 that are released dur­ing pro­cess­ing. Nev­er­the­less, this step already improves the industry’s car­bon foot­print by a quar­ter. This foot­print can be opti­mized even fur­ther to 0.6 met­ric tons of CO2 per ton of cement by imple­ment­ing new pro­duc­tion meth­ods as well as cap­tur­ing and stor­ing CO2 process emis­sions,” explains Reinhausen’s spe­cial­ist Stephan Rupp.

MORE DYNAMIC GRID FEEDBACK

Alu­minum min­ing and pro­duc­tion also requires enor­mous amounts of ener­gy and is there­fore dam­ag­ing to the envi­ron­ment. Only 65 mil­lion met­ric tons of this light met­al are pro­duced world­wide in com­par­i­son to the larg­er quan­ti­ties of steel and cement. How­ev­er, the process con­sumes mas­sive amounts of ener­gy: The alu­minum oxide is mined at great expense and then reduced to alu­minum in alu­minum smelters using an elec­trol­y­sis process that requires 15,7 MWh of ener­gy per met­ric ton.

The annu­al pro­duc­tion of alu­minum from ore releas­es more than 1.3 bil­lion tons of CO2 per year. This cor­re­sponds to about four per­cent of glob­al CO2 emis­sions today. Poten­tial sav­ings could be made here with regard to fuel emis­sions in par­tic­u­lar by using green elec­tric­i­ty for elec­trol­y­sis and by increas­ing the pro­por­tion of scrap met­al in the mate­r­i­al cycle. The lat­ter solu­tion proves to be par­tic­u­lar­ly worth­while, with a whop­ping 95 per­cent of emis­sions saved com­pared to smelt­ing. In fact, 20 mil­lion met­ric tons of alu­minum are already pro­duced from scrap met­al today. What does this devel­op­ment mean for our grids?

“Grid feed­back will increase due to dynam­ic and unbal­anced loads. This in turn will increase the demands placed on the indus­try to build mod­ern grid infra­struc­tures.” Thomas Rösel­er

In the indus­try seg­ment as a whole, elec­tri­cal ener­gy cur­rent­ly accounts for around 14 per­cent of total ener­gy con­sump­tion. IRENA (Inter­na­tion­al Renew­able Ener­gy Agency) esti­mates that this share is expect­ed to grow to more than 63 per­cent by 2050 with plants expect­ed to gen­er­ate about 40 per­cent them­selves (solar, bio­mass, process heat), while obtain­ing the rest from pow­er grids.

Thomas Rösel­er, Head of Inno­va­tion and Projects for a num­ber of future grid sta­bi­liza­tion projects at Rein­hausen, reports: “With their rotat­ing gen­er­a­tors, ther­mal pow­er plants still play a deci­sive role when it comes to ensur­ing sta­ble fre­quen­cy qual­i­ty and pow­er qual­i­ty. How­ev­er, these will be con­sid­er­ably reduced over the next two decades and replaced by volatile sources. At the same time, grid feed­back will increase due to dynam­ic and unbal­anced loads, such as those gen­er­at­ed by large con­sumers like elec­tric arc fur­naces. This in turn will increase the demands placed on the indus­try to build mod­ern grid infra­struc­tures.”

SECURING COMPANY GRIDS

Accord­ing to Thomas Rösel­er, the change in ener­gy sys­tems is gain­ing even more ground among con­sumers: Clas­sic dri­ve tech­nolo­gies, for exam­ple in min­ing or com­pres­sor dri­ves for gas liq­ue­fac­tion plants (LNG), are being replaced by pow­er elec­tron­ic sys­tems with a pow­er range of up to 100MW. And also in this regard, the flow of ener­gy is becom­ing increas­ing­ly bidi­rec­tion­al. The future will no longer rely on a sin­gle gen­er­a­tor, but on a mul­ti­tude of dis­persed pro­duc­ers, some of which will be oper­at­ed by the man­u­fac­tur­ing com­pa­nies them­selves. “All of these changes on both the pro­duc­tion and con­sump­tion sides have an impact on pow­er qual­i­ty which needs to be har­mo­nized,” under­lines the Head of Inno­va­tion.

By +450 per­cent, accord­ing to IRENA fore­casts, the share of elec­tri­cal ener­gy in total ener­gy use in the indus­tri­al seg­ment is expect­ed to increase: of which 40 per­cent self-pro­duced and 60 per­cent from the net­works.

And as Thomas Rösel­er points out, this needs to start right from the plan­ning phase. In addi­tion to knowl­edge about sup­ply struc­tures, grid plan­ners also require an indepth under­stand­ing of the customer’s tech­nol­o­gy to cre­ate cor­re­spond­ing infra­struc­tures and pro­vide equip­ment. This means that plan­ners are often caught between the expec­ta­tions of con­sumers (such as steel, cement, or alu­minum and cop­per pro­duc­ers) and the require­ments of sup­pli­ers. “In the future, plan­ners will need a lot of exper­tise in build­ing and pro­tect­ing com­pa­ny grids—depending on the tech­nol­o­gy used by con­sumers —to ensure the con­nec­tion con­di­tions,” explains Thomas Rösel­er.

Both sup­ply process­es and cus­tomer tech­nolo­gies are plac­ing ever high­er demands on pow­er qual­i­ty and sup­ply reli­a­bil­i­ty. For exam­ple, it is increas­ing­ly nec­es­sary to com­pen­sate for reac­tive pow­er and reduce har­mon­ics in indus­tri­al dis­tri­b­u­tion grids. How­ev­er, the MR spe­cial­ist goes on to say that indi­vid­ual solu­tions are also need­ed at the medi­um and high-volt­age lev­el, for exam­ple to improve the grid sta­bil­i­ty at crit­i­cal nodes.

“To pre­vent volt­age drops and fluc­tu­a­tions such as flick­er, or to pro­vide dynam­ic reac­tive pow­er, con­sumers will require more tried-and-test­ed sys­tems to com­pen­sate for reac­tive pow­er; filter cir­cuit sys­tems for har­mon­ics; and dynam­ic reac­tive pow­er com­pen­sa­tion sys­tems to sta­bi­lize the line volt­age. Those are just a few of the chal­lenges fac­ing pro­duc­ers and grid oper­a­tors down the line.”

REINHAUSEN INSIDE

Solu­tions to improve pow­er qual­i­ty and reac­tive pow­er com­pen­sa­tion will be vital in the grids of the future. A cru­cial role is played by fil­ter cir­cuit sys­tems for har­mon­ics as well as by dynam­ic reac­tive pow­er com­pen­sa­tion sys­tems to sta­bi­lize the line volt­age.


Maschi­nen­fab­rik Rein­hausen has exten­sive exper­tise when it comes to plan­ning and sup­ply­ing suit­able sys­tems that ensure, on the one hand, seam­less pro­duc­tion and, on the oth­er, com­pli­ance with the require­ments for grid con­nec­tion.


IYOUR PERSONAL CONTACT


Do you have any ques­tions?
Thomas Rösel­er:
T.Roeseler@reinhausen.com


Dr. Stephan Rupp:
S.Rupp@reinhausen.com


Share with your network!

Never miss an issue again!

Click here to subscribe for free.